Comedian Druski is now entirely off the hook of a set of wild allegations tying him to a federal lawsuit with music tycoon Diddy. The judge's decision is based on cold, hard facts, from the most modest of bank statements to phone data that told the real story.
There is zero evidence that Druski had any connection to California at the time of the alleged 2018 assault, which the judge noted was detailed in "graphic" documents submitted by plaintiff Ashley Parham. In her complaint, Parham alleged Druski doused her with baby oil or lubricant and then "shot himself off onto her naked body like a slip and slide," knocking the wind out of her with his significant weight. The premise painted an ugly picture of what was supposedly happening at one of Diddy's infamous "Freak Off" parties, where it was reported that 1,500 bottles of baby oil were confiscated months later by federal agents.
Check Out This Related Article: Kesha & Aubrey O’Day Rally Behind Cassie After Diddy Verdict
However, the phone records and bank logs place Druski squarely in Georgia, not L.A., and nowhere near Diddy, certainly not partying like a rock star. Indeed, when the aspiring comic was reportedly masturbating in front of his victims, he was a 23-year-old waiter in Georgia, scraping to get by long before ever becoming a household name.
The plaintiff's initial reports described the attackers as "thin white men," a detail that does not match Druski, neither in his physical appearance nor in his background. But lo and behold, his name emerged months later, precisely in the fortunate timing after the press had started to cover the suit.
Druski's legal team was not mincing words. There was not only no history to the party, they alleged, but there was no relationship with the other defendants in the lawsuit, either professionally or personally, they said. The judge sided with the defendants and threw out the claims as "unsupported" and "disconnected from reality."
Now, Druski's team is seeking judicial sanctions against Parham's attorneys, calling the case a "total fiction" filled with factual gaps. They're also seeking the court to award them attorney's fees and impose financial sanctions on the accuser's legal team.
A hearing scheduled for July 8, 2025, will finally put the accusers in the spotlight, rather than the accused. It's a big moment for Druski, who has emerged from this behind-the-scenes mess with his name cleared and his reputation.
0 Comments