Diddy Blasts Lawyer Over Druski Baby Oil Lawsuit, "Depraved and Facially Implausible" Claims Stir Controversy

The music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs is swinging back against the attorney Ariel Mitchell, who filed the most recent suit, slamming it as a lowlife cash grab designed to make headlines. At the center of this strange $50 million legal firestorm? A hilarious accusation that girl free of baby oil Now a less devra, drily.

The controversy began on March 7, when Ashley Parham filed a lawsuit alleging that she was sexually assaulted, trafficked, and threatened with death at a party hosted by Combs in 2018. Her allegations involve Diddy, NFL star Odell Beckham Jr., and comedian Druski in what sounds more like a Hollywood thriller than a legal situation.

But Combs isn't having it. He called the lawsuit "depraved," and "facially implausible." His camp's statement offered that the suit is only Mitchell's latest publicity stunt after previously being sued by Combs for defamation. "This complaint illustrates the heinous reach that plaintiffs will go through in order to get press in hopes of a payout," his reps said, indicating that they see this as simply an act of desperation.

The most eyebrow-raising aspect of the lawsuit focuses on Druski, who, according to Parham, covered her in baby oil before running her body like a "slip and slide" during a sexual assault.

Druski wasted no time in setting the record straight. The comedian, who has become a massive success in the entertainment industry, responded to the accusations with a direct and personal line of defense.

"This allegation is a made-up fraud," he said. "All I was in 2018 was a broke person with no connections to the entertainment industry, living with my mom. So to even have my name on the list, to be included, is so extreme."

Druski's statement went on to say that he is heartbroken for actual victims of abuse and confident that the evidence will expose the lies in the lawsuit. His pointed words called into question the accusations and underscored an obvious question: How could he have been wrapped up in something at a high-profile party when he was barely trying to break into show business?

But the accusations don't end there; Druski is not the only one accused. Parham's complaint also depicted Diddy in a far more sinister light, claiming that he threatened her physically with a knife and said that he would give her a "Glasgow smile" and a vicious injury to the face for comments she made about his alleged role in the death of Tupac Shakur.

Among those named in the lawsuit are Beckham Jr. and Combs' mother, whom Parham says pressured her to be quiet. But law enforcement does not appear to have bought into those claims." A Contra Costa Sheriff's Department spokesman, Jimmy Lee, confirmed that detectives found Parham's allegations unfounded.

For Diddy, this legal struggle is just the latest skirmish in a long-running war. He has already filed a separate $50 million defamation lawsuit against Mitchell, Nexstar Media Inc. (which owns NewsNation), and Courtney Burgess, accusing them of making false allegations against him. His team stands firm, saying, "Mr. Combs looks forward to the day he gets to face his accuser in court where these lies and the perverse motives of those who told them will be revealed."

As the case plays out, one thing is sure: this lawsuit is as explosive as it is controversial. However, whether these accusations withstand scrutiny in a court of law or crumble under the weight of its validation process is to be determined. For now, the drama plays on, and the world watches.