TV's most well-known therapist-turned-legal analyst, Dr. Phil McGraw, has made an astonishing prediction regarding the federal trial of music impresario Sean "Diddy" Combs. As the fourth week of the trial gets underway, Dr. Phil offers insight into whether the prosecution's emotionally charged case is driving itself into a legal ditch and whether it may do so because it doesn't make it to the jury.
Diddy is being charged in an onslaught of federal charges, including racketeering, sex trafficking, and transportation of persons for prostitution. The trial itself, however, has been nothing short of explosive, filled with graphic allegations and emotional testimony, particularly from Diddy's former partner, the singer Cassie Ventura, whose two days of testimony painted a chilling portrait of abuse, control, and trauma.
Check out this Article.
"They thought their evidence against Combs was emotionally so powerful, so sensational, that the jury would be so offended that they'd convict Combs whether or not the facts fit the charges," Dr. Phil told The Daily Mail.
Dr. Phil says while the trial has had its emotional moments, the government's case could be legally flimsy. He also expects Diddy's defense team to ask for a directed verdict sooner rather than later, an aggressive legal move that, if successful, would enable U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian to toss the entire case before it gets to the jury.
But Cassie Ventura, likely the strongest card the Feds have on R. Kelly, only adds emotional weight to his testimony, which, powerful though it is, may not, in legal terms, connect the dots to the federal charges. "None of that's illegal on the face of it," he said of Ventura's descriptions of terror.
Legal analysts say the prosecution has made a risky bet on Ventura's testimony. Her conflicted relationship with Diddy, combined with the prosecution's broad strokes of a story, may be an argument too fragile to stand up in court. Dr. Phil even speculated that the government may have "overcharged the case by sipping on what I call 'sweet poison."
Already, legal watchers feel like they've seen this story play out before during the notorious O.J. Simpson trial, in which public outcry versus the ability of prosecutors actually to secure a conviction burned brighter than an acid flare.
If the judge sides with the defense in the motion for a directed verdict, the trial could come to a screeching halt, which would be a humiliating defeat for the government and a stunning legal accomplishment for Diddy. But if Dr. Phil is to be believed, this circus will end sooner and more quietly than you ever thought possible.
0 Comments